Already reeling from racist suggestions in the royal family from Prince Harry and Duchess MeghanOn Wednesday, Buckingham Palace faced explosive new allegations of decades of systemic discrimination against people of color – and documents to back it up.
The Guardian, a left-leaning British newspaper and a leader in the long-running movement to get rid of the monarchy, Published a report announcing that Queen Elizabeth II’s senior royals had banned “people of color” immigrants or foreigners From serving in clerical roles in the royal family until at least the late 1960s, according to documents discovered in the UK National Archives.
(Documents reveal) how in 1968 the Queen’s chief financial officer informed civil servants that “it was not, in fact, the practice of appointing immigrants of color or foreigners” to religious positions in the royal family, even though they were allowed to work as domestic servants,” she stated. The Guardian newspaper.
A new kind of royal family: On the third anniversary, Harry and Meghan embraced a revolution in royal roles
During the same period, senior positions advising the king mostly went to white, upper-class or aristocratic males, many of whom were Uxbridge graduates and/or served in high-ranking positions in the military.
The newspaper also reported that documents show that in the 1970s, the Queen and her aides were able to negotiate with government officials to exempt the royal family from laws prohibiting discriminatory hiring practices, which to this day prevent royal employees from filing lawsuits over alleged discrimination at work. .
USA TODAY has requested comment from Buckingham Palace on the guard’s story.
The Guardian suggested the news, which came after a near-national nervous breakdown in March What Harry and Meghan said about racism in the family and the media in their interview with Oprah WinfreyIt would certainly “re-ignite the debate about the British royal family and race”.
Among other things, the Queen’s grandson, 36, and his biracial American wife, 39, have claimed that she has been the target of racism in the media and on social media, and that a member of the royal family has questioned the color of her child. skin.
In a timing that may have been accidental, the news came in the guard on the same day Buckingham Palace announces plans to celebrate the Queen’s platinum jubilee Next year marks the 70th anniversary of her accession to the throne – an unprecedented milestone for any British monarch.
Prince William and Duchess Kate:Gold is still on their tenth wedding anniversary
At first, the palace refused to respond to the guard for her report. Later, the palace issued a statement to E! News, Which suggests that claims based on “an indirect account of conversations over 50 years ago” may not be relevant to contemporary processes.
“The royal family and the king abide by the provisions of the Equality Law, in principle and in practice,” the palace statement said. “This is reflected in the policies, procedures and practices of diversity, inclusion and dignity at work within the royal family. Any complaints that may be raised under the law follow a formal process that provides a means for any complaint to be heard and addressed.”
After Harry and Meghan announced their complaint in a conversation with Winfrey, Palace waited two days to issue an accurate statement usually بيان He said the couple’s accusations of racism and lack of support were being taken “very seriously” and the royal family would address them “in private”.
“The entire family is saddened to learn the full extent of how difficult the past few years have been for Harry and Meghan. The issues raised, particularly the issue of race, are concerning,” the statement read. “While some memories may vary, they are taken very seriously and will be taken up in private by the family. Harry, Meghan and Archie will always be very lovable members of the family.”
Since then the palace has remained silent. However, Harry’s brother, Prince William, responded to a reporter’s question during their engagement a few days later, He succinctly declared that the royal family “is not very much a racist family.”
Prince Harry on mental health:Harry said he turned to alcohol and drugs to get through a “nightmare” period in his life
Meanwhile, Harry and Meghan, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex, She has been ridiculed in Britain by the media, MPs and millions of BritonsAccording to multiple polls and a deluge of comments on social media. They refused to issue a statement in response to the Guardian’s story on National Archives documents.
the couple, They now live in California after giving up their royal roles to achieve greater financial independence and freedom, surprised the global public three months ago by claiming that an unidentified member of the royal family had expressed concern about the possible color of the The skin of their mixed-race baby.
They also claimed that Meghan became suicidal due to the stress of being in the royal family, but was turned down when she sought help from the royal family.
Archie celebrates two years:Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan publish a new photo and members of the royal family pay tribute
But the Daily Mail, a leader in the campaign against Harry and Meghan after their explosive interview (and On the losing side of Meghan’s privacy lawsuit), among the media that recognized the potential impact of the Guardian report.
“(Documents) are likely to be discovered. Embarrassing for the company as it grapples with accusations of systemic racism.” Made by Harry and Meghan, The Mail concluded on Wednesday.
It is also likely to increase The Guardian campaign against the parliamentary mechanism known as the “Queen’s Consent” which allow the Crown to secretly pressure the government to amend laws it does not favor or to exempt the Crown.
Republicans, as anti-monarchists are known in Britain, consider this practice to be opaque and unconstitutional, and have used it to argue that Britain should abolish the monarchy and elect a head of state.
Queen Elizabeth celebrates 95:Just days after the death of husband Prince Philipto
0 Comments