Former Trump Officials Behaving Badly: Redfield and Slawi


It was SARS-CoV-2 Sequenced in January 2020The analysis immediately showed that the virus is, as the name suggests, very similar to the SARS-CoV virus that causes SARS. Both, in turn, are nearly identical to the existing viruses A settlement inside bats. Specifically, for the family that houses Horseshoe bat, Which are found in the tropics of Asia and Africa. The virus behind COVID-19 is the seventh coronavirus to spread to humans. Three of these viruses can cause serious illness. Each of the previous coronaviruses that cause serious illness in humans came from bats. And by March 2020, scientists He had a very good idea of ​​the origin of SARS-CoV-2; It was not lab.

Redfield’s whole basis for the claim that COVID-19 did not come directly from bats is that it is highly contagious. In his interview with CNNThe former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) insists it takes time for viruses to “figure out” how to become more efficient at dealing with humans. And to some extent, that last part is true; Viruses tend to become more contagious over time. This is, in fact, the only evolutionary pressure on viruses.

However, this statement ignores an overwhelming amount of evidence about COVID-19. For one thing, the virus is definitely not specific to humans. Cases of spread to Close relatives like gorillas, As well as related distant mammals such as Tigers And Household pets. COVID-19 is not, or at least not, initiated as a human. Its toolkit of proteins allows to infect almost any mammal. What happened over time – as we’ve seen with the European variant, the British variant, the South African variant, and the Brazilian variant – is that SARS-CoV-2 has become permanent. Best In spreading from person to person.

Something like this probably happened at first, too. In fact, people may have been exposed or even infected with versions of the SARS-CoV virus for years before an infectious version emerged from person to person. Imagine a situation where people exposed to horseshoe bats were infected with a precursor virus, and they produced trillions of copies … but none of them were effective in spreading that infection to someone else. Then, one day in late 2019, someone becomes infected with the same virus, and a slight mutation allows the condition to spread from person to person. It is very likely that this is the actual situation.

Another thing we know is that the version of SARS-CoV-2 that spread around the world and caused COVID-19 has not been circulating in humans for a long time. We know this because all of the early cases of COVID-19 that have been sequenced were nearly genetically identical. This would not have been the case had the disease been spreading widely in humans for several months before the outbreak of the recognized outbreak.

There are still serious questions about the origins of SARS-CoV-2 that need to be answered. For example, was there a previous related version of the virus that did not cause severe disease and spread among humans before 2020? This may explain reports of antibodies similar to those from SARS-CoV-2 appearing in blood samples outside China in November of 2019.

Did the virus jump directly from bats to humans, or was this virus specifically transmitted to it first in an “intermediate host” such as the poor, trapped pangolin, or in something common that is raised and eaten like rabbits? Bats have unusual immune systems, which makes them A. Unique viral reservoirTherefore, it is important to know whether these diseases make a jump directly from bats, or whether a feature “that affects any mammal” developed elsewhere.

These are exactly the kind of questions the WHO is currently addressing. The investigation into the origins of COVID-19 began in 2020. The investigation has been released Initial reportMore comprehensive Updated reportA final report is due to appear within days.

All of these reports, and all of the analyzes that have been published, agree on one thing: SARS-CoV-2 shows exactly the type of structure that might have been expected from the natural evolution of the related viruses, and there are no fingerprints. It would have been expected if the virus had been tampered with in the laboratory. Redfield’s claims about scientists working with viruses to make them more infectious in order to make them easier to study are simply meaningless. How well does the virus pass from person to person nothing at all How easy is this virus to replicate in the laboratory? If Redfield is to rely on “I am a virologist,” he should be forced to explain this fundamental flaw in his thinking.

What Redfield says does not match the scientific data. However, they match perfectly The allegations of Donald Trump In April 2020. Trump became obsessed with the idea of ​​”proving” that COVID-19 originated in the laboratory. He made such accusations during those daily raucous sessions that replaced job briefs about the pandemic, instructing agencies – which would likely include Redfield – to come out and find the evidence he wanted. They did not find this evidence.

In response to Redfield’s bizarre insistence to support a theory that is not only devoid of evidence, but also inconsistent with evidence, Anthony Fauci I stopped smacking the former CDC head. However, he made it clear that there was nothing unusual about the notion that the virus that spread in Wuhan during November and December had become highly contagious by the time the outbreak began in January.

Seems to be forgotten now that Redfield is “the ex-director of the CDC” in every article or interview he appears in, is that Redfield He shouldn’t have held this position in the first place. His biggest claim to fame has been the insistence that the Department of Defense is conducting a massive HIV testing program, not with the intention of helping anyone who becomes infected, but as a way to purge the military of LGBT people. Redfield saw HIV infection as a sign of “immorality.” Then he followed up with a program that supports HIV treatment that didn’t work.

At the CDC, Redfield has been complicit in constantly weakening guidelines, making it even more difficult for scientists at the agency to bring out the facts. And in late September, he was telling Americans there would be no vaccines for COVID-19 Until late 2021 (Redfield reckons he was also telling Americans that the same effect could be achieved if everyone wore masks.)

Meanwhile, in apparently unrelated news, Moncef El-Salawi took command The Trump Warp Speed ​​operation was “terminated” by the former employer’s board of directors after accusations of sexual harassment and inappropriate behavior. Allegations have been investigated before GlaxoSmithKline, which says its investigation supported the charges against El-Slawi.

“Dr. Al-Salawi’s behavior is totally unacceptable. It represents an abuse of his leadership position, violates company policies, and conflicts with the strong values ​​that define GSK’s culture.”

Al-Sallawi, at least, appears to have a career that warrants a measure of confidence when it comes to being appointed to the top position in Trump’s vaccine effort. However, it appears that his greatest achievement at GSK has been in guiding the company in taking over other pharmaceutical companies. Once in charge of Operation Warp Speed, Al Sailawi took an approach that seemed just like that Ensure a vaccine shortage. Not only has OWS failed to secure an adequate vaccine for America, its largest investment was $ 1.6 billion for the Novavax vaccine, which remains unavailable, and $ 2.1 billion for a vaccine from Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline. This vaccine was returned to square one in December, when it was found that it was not generating an adequate immune response.

At best, Al-Sailawi made a fatal mistake. At worst, that is Colossal corruption From a former executive still controlling $ 10 million in GlaxoSmithKline shares. “I will not leave these shares, because this is my retirement,” said Slaoui, before giving his old company $ 2.1 billion.

Retirement sounds like a good idea … for both El Sailawi and Redfield. When CNN is looking for scientists who can shed some light on the COVID-19 vaccine, these two are among the last things to ask about.

Like it? Share with your friends!


What's Your Reaction?

hate hate
confused confused
fail fail
fun fun
geeky geeky
love love
lol lol
omg omg
win win


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *